Someone posted an article on Facebook about the Christian Bed and Breakfast
owners in England
who lost in court after they stood up for their convictions. They ended up
having to sell their business.
The Facebook post brought a number of comments, and there
was a very interesting one that criticized the Christian couple by using the
text of 1 Corinthians 13, basically implying
that if we operate by love, we will be accepting of others, no matter
what. Below is a combination of two comments I made to the post.
1 Corinthians 13 is generally considered "The Love
Chapter," and it makes some great statements about love in general, but if
that is all we see there, we are isolating it, using it out of context, and are
missing the point. Chapter 13 is in the middle of a longer passage (Chapters
12-14) dealing with spiritual gifts within the Body of Christ. Chapter 13
teaches us that the use of spiritual gifts is only profitable and beneficial to
the body if they are used in a context of love.
It is not possible to find anything in this chapter, or anywhere
else in Scripture, that justifies giving tacit approval to things that God says
are wrong. “Love” does not mean compromising with the world’s philosophies,
lifestyles, or standards. There is a great deal said today about
"tolerance" in our culture, and it is usually Christians who are told
they need to be tolerant. We rarely hear about any necessity for people to be
tolerant of Christians. In reality, the majority of Christians are the most
tolerant of people.
The meaning of the word “tolerance” has been changed by many to
mean "approval." In reality, the actual meaning of the word implies
that we only tolerate that with which we disagree. I can tolerate people with
whom I disagree without giving my approval of their lifestyle, doctrine,
etc. I can be tolerant of a person but
be utterly in disagreement with their lifestyle or beliefs. If I approve of
everything someone does, I am no longer tolerating them, I am agreeing with
them.
To truly tolerate someone with whom we disagree means we do not try to
destroy their property or to hurt or kill them. Instead, we recognize their
freedom to do what they are doing, but we do not have to agree with them. If
someone says, “You have to be tolerant and accept what I do,” that individual
has no comprehension of the meaning of “tolerance.” If a believer accepts
someone’s sinful lifestyle, then that believer is not loving the other
individual in any way. That is no more a way to show love than an overindulgent
parent is showing love when he allows his children to do things that are
harmful to themselves. Overindulgence is not love. Approving of sin is not
love. Real love is tied to the truth.
There are things taking place that I can do nothing about
other than stand faithfully for the truth of the Gospel. I can tolerate people,
who were made in God's image, without agreeing with their behavior. When
government gives “hearty approval” to evil, it has stepped over a line. “...they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them” (Romans 1:32, NASB). I cannot put a stop to behavior with which I disagree, but I do not
have to give it my approval by allowing it in my house. Those who wish to do those things can go
elsewhere.
From what I have read on the subject, the people involved in
this situation did what they needed to do in order to be consistent with their
convictions. That is a basic tenet of freedom. There used to be, and maybe
there still are a few, signs displayed in places of business that say “We
reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.” In reality, that is consistent
with biblical truth. In Matthew 20, Jesus told the Parable of the Workers in
the Vineyard. The owner of the vineyard made equal payments to all who worked
that day, from those who had worked all day to those who had only worked one
hour. Some of those he hired were saying things very similar to what people
would be saying today. “Not fair! Not fair! I’ll call the union,” etc. “But he answered and said to one
of them, ‘Friend, I am doing you no wrong; did you not agree with me for a
denarius? Take what is yours and go, but I wish to give
to this last man the same as to you.
Is it not lawful for me to do what I wish with what is my own? Or is your eye envious because I am generous?’” (Matthew
20, 13-15, NASB). From the narrative, it is clear the Jesus approved of this
man doing what he wished with what was his own. Private property, and the use
of private property, is a biblical principle. “Is it not lawful for me to
do what I wish with what is my own?” is a biblical way to express “We reserve the right to
refuse service to anyone.”
It is not the
responsibility of every business to provide services to everyone. For example, I
don't go into shops that sell incense, candles, and other New Age
paraphernalia, but I also don't try to deny their right to have a store just
because they don't meet my needs. I go to other stores. The lawsuits that are
allowed these days border on insanity. It is up to the customers to find a
store or business that suits them rather than trying to force every business to
change to meet their individual needs. We need to allow the free market to take
care of such things. If there is a demand, someone will supply it. If a
business doesn't have enough customers, it will be out of business. Government
needs to stay out of such things.
If I were ever to go into a store that had a sign posted that
said, “We don’t sell to or serve Christians,” I would politely take my business
elsewhere. If they don’t want my money, that would be fine with me. It’s their
loss. I would not raise a ruckus or sue them. Instead, I would pity them and
pray for them, because being anti-Christian means being anti-Jesus Christ, which
means they need Him as Savior. Not only would they lose out on a sale, they
would also be losing out on salvation because of their unbelief. As Christians,
there needs to be a difference between how we handle such matters and how
unbelievers handle them.
It was rightly pointed out by another
commenter that 1 Corinthians 13:6 says, “Love does not delight in evil but rejoices
with the truth.”
That commonly posted sign, "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone," I fear is no longer a right and may soon be deemed illegal for any or all reasons. The truth is, today there is very little enjoyment of private property rights and freedoms. Anyone who even "feels" offended can make complaint that could be interpreted as discriminatory, intolerant, or hateful.
ReplyDeleteIn my store, I am very accepting, and tolerant of the most hated, despised, and abused people in the country today. If you are a working, straight, white, constitutional conservative Christian, you are welcome in our store.
ReplyDelete