As
I said at the beginning of my review of “Son of God,” it is important to
realize that any movie based on a book of any kind must, of necessity, take a
few “artistic liberties,” such as supplying dialog, filling in unknown details,
compressing parts of the story, combining events, etc. Otherwise, a
movie made based on three chapters of a book would be extremely short and would
probably become a documentary, and a movie based on a long book would be far
too long.
Moviemakers are free to embellish and change stories to make them
work on the screen. Even movies based on the Bible are subject to such treatment,
but it is important that changes not be made that change the entire meaning of
the Scriptures. It is quite easy to move from “artistic license” to blasphemy
without much effort at all. Even though I tend to notice distortions from the original
account when the Bible is portrayed on film, I generally overlook certain
things as long as violence is not done to important truth. It is vital that
biblical doctrine not be compromised in the name of artistic license and that
the name of the Lord Jesus Christ be lifted up and magnified. With those things
in mind, I attended both films earlier this week.
“In the beginning there was nothing.” This is how “Noah” began, and it
went downhill from there. The Bible clearly begins, “In the beginning God…”
While it is true that all created things had a beginning, there never has been
“nothing.” The eternal, self-existent God has always been there. "In the beginning there was nothing" smacks of the big bang theory: "Nothing exploded and here we are."
It is interesting to note that the name of God was never mentioned in the
film. Instead, reference is made to “the creator,” a term which is accurate to
describe one of God’s attributes, because He is our Creator. However, it is
quite revealing when it is used as it was in the film. It is a reminder of the
“creator” of Gnosticism – the one who is demented and evil and who created the
material universe, which is itself evil. Only the spiritual is good. Yet the
Scriptures tell us that …God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good (Genesis 1:31, NKJV). God did not create an evil universe.
Instead, all of His perfect creation fell under the curse when man sinned in
the Garden of Eden.
There were a few, very few, biblically
correct elements to this film. There was a man named Noah. He had three sons –
Shem, Ham, and Japheth. He built an ark. There were animals on the ark. There
was a flood, and surprisingly, it appeared to be a global flood, but perhaps
that was just an illusion to appease those who believe the Bible. Beyond those
facts, there is little, if anything, to commend this movie as being even close
to truth.
It was made quite clear fairly early in the
movie that “the creator” intended to wipe out the entire human race and most of
the animals with a flood. The Bible tells us why God determined to bring the
flood: Then the Lord saw that the wickedness of man was
great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was
only evil continually… The earth also was corrupt before God, and the
earth was filled with violence. So God looked upon the
earth, and indeed it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way on the
earth (Genesis 6:5,11-12 NKJV). Man was in
rebellion against God, and God basically said, “Enough!” However, the film
makes it seem that, while there were vile and evil people on the earth, the
major transgression was hunting animals and using the earth’s resources. This
was a not-so-thinly veiled statement on “animal rights” and extreme
environmentalism, with Noah being the chief environmentalist. The barrenness of
the landscape in the film underscored this bias. It is not reasonable to
believe that Noah and his contemporaries lived in something that looked like a
post-nuclear war wasteland. It probably looked something like that after the
flood, but certainly not before.
The implication of the film was that Noah
believed the ark was built to save the innocent animals, but that all humans
were evil because of their lack of taking care of the earth and were to be
destroyed. This is in direct conflict with the Word of God, which states, By faith Noah, being divinely warned of things not yet seen, moved with
godly fear, prepared an ark for
the saving of his household, by which he condemned
the world and became heir of the righteousness which is according to faith (Hebrews 11:7, NKJV). This does not sound
anything like the fake “Noah” in the film.
The film showed a not-so-thinly disguised
visual of animals that could only be interpreted to be evolution. This
was just a slam at the Genesis account of God’s creation of all things,
including life forms. It was not surprising to see this. Evolution is thought
by many to be the unifying truth of science, although a biblical and common sense approach
to science reveals just how absurd this idea is.
The Bible tells us that Noah
was a just man, perfect in his generations. Noah walked with God (Genesis 6:9). This is because Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD. (Genesis 6:8, NKJV). 2 Peter 2:5 tells us that Noah was a preacher of righteousness. The Noah in
the film is presented as an angry, human-hating, homicidal maniac – certainly
nothing like the biblical Noah.
An almost comical part of the film was the
presence of giant rock creatures called “watchers,” who were fallen angels. The
Bible does tell us that there were giants on the earth in those days (Genesis
6:4, NKJV), but it most certainly does not tell us they were fallen angels who
morphed into “Transformers” or “Gobots.” The relationship between fallen angels
and giants is a topic of much debate among Bible scholars, and it likely will
never be settled until we find out in eternity. Even though the Bible makes it
abundantly clear that fallen angels are demons who do evil, these “watchers” did
good by helping Noah in many ways, including building the ark. Ultimately, they
protected Noah and his family from the evil line of Cain. Fallen angels doing good is a bit much to swallow. Their reward for
this was that they returned to heaven. There is
a theological problem here. Not only is there no salvation for fallen angels –
they are eternally doomed – but even if there were salvation for them, it would
not be on the basis of good works but on the basis of the grace of God.
If the film had shown Noah hiring people to
help him build the ark, I would not argue about that. Such is quite possible and would have been a reasonable use of artistic freedom. The Bible does not tell us how he went about the building process. It is quite
reasonable to think it is possible that he got help from the community.
Obviously, there are those who will accept a job even if they think the outcome
is pointless. If they are paid enough, they will do the job. We don’t know that
he did or didn’t do this. It is not worth fighting over. However, this is far different from from the help he received from giant “watchers” of the film.
In the Scriptures, Noah walked with God and
God spoke to him. In the film, Noah seems to be in the dark, only finding out
what “the creator” wants through very unclear dreams and a visit to his
grandfather Methuselah where they shared some hallucinogenic wine which helped
them see what “the creator” had planned.
There are some interesting things about
Methuselah in the film that no one ever got from the Bible. The film presents him
as dying in the flood, yet his name means "when he dies, judgment." There is
every reason to believe that Methuselah was a man of God, and his death was a
warning that the flood was coming in a very short time, perhaps within only a few
days. In addition, he presented Noah with a seed from the Garden of Eden that
magically grew a forest from which Noah got the wood to build the ark. This is one of many events in the film than
indicate the Bible was not used as a source for the story. Instead, it was
simply made up. It would have been much more productive for the filmmakers to
simply ignore the Bible entirely, including the name “Noah,” and just make up
another science fiction story. That is basically what they did, but I suspect
they tried to make it sound a bit biblical in order to pull in some Christians
into their audience.
The film makes it appear, based on the ages
of Noah’s sons, that it only took about ten years to build the ark. However, it
is clear in the Scriptures that it took much longer.
There was a mysterious religious talisman in
the form of a snake skin that appeared to be very important to the characters
in the film. It is interesting to note that the serpent was the animal that Satan
inhabited as he tempted Eve, and the serpent is generally thought of as a
symbol for evil. God’s people do not need such objects. Noah would certainly
not have valued such a thing. This makes Noah and his people appear to be
pagans rather than the people of God.
As Noah and his family were boarding the ark,
the evil army of the descendants of Cain attacked and attempted to kill Noah
and take the ark. If it hadn’t been for “the watchers,” those giant rock
creatures, they would have succeeded. In reality, Noah had all the protection he
needed. God took care of and protected him and his family. When it came time to
board the ark, we are told that the Lord
shut him in (Genesis 7:16).
What could be more clear in the Scriptures than
the identities of those who went aboard the ark? So Noah, with his sons, his
wife, and his sons' wives, went into the ark because of the waters of the flood (Genesis 7:7). This obviously tells us that
eight people went on board and specifically who they were. Yet
the film shows Noah, his wife, his three sons, and Shem’s wife going on board.
Ham and Japheth did not yet have wives.
Why was it necessary to
distort the Scriptures in this way? At first I thought it was just another way
for the film to stick a finger in the eye of Christians and of God Himself by
changing His Word. Then I realized it was a way of furthering the agenda of
saying Noah wanted all humans destroyed. Shem’s wife was barren (another blatant change of the truth of Scripture), the other sons
were without wives, and we can presume that Noah and his wife were beyond the age of childbearing. As a result, the
human race would die off in the years following the flood.
Of course, Noah was
unaware that Methuselah had used his magic to fix the problem that caused
Shem’s wife to be barren, so when he found out she was pregnant, he determined
that if the baby was a girl, he would immediately kill her as soon as she was born. Shem and his wife
attempted to leave the ark to prevent this, but Noah prevented them from
leaving. When it turned out to be twin girls, everyone was in turmoil. In the
end, Noah could not go through with taking the lives of his grandchildren, and I imagine we are supposed to assume
that the little girls grew up to become the wives of Ham and Japheth, and that is why the human race is still here. After the ark landed, Ham left the family to go and
live on his own without a wife. Maybe in a few years he got lonely and returned
to take one of his nieces as his wife. Who knows? This film was utterly foolish
and convoluted.
By the way, the film also shows a stowaway on the ark: Tubal-Cain of the line of Cain. While on
board, he was killing and eating animals, which means some kinds of animals were made
extinct during the voyage. Ham was in cahoots with Tubal-Cain in a plot to kill
Noah because Noah had prevented Ham from getting a wife prior to the flood, but
in the end, he couldn’t go though with it and killed Tubal-Cain instead. In
addition to being unbiblical and idiotic, this added nothing to the story. What
nonsense!
Noah ended up considering himself a total failure because he did not
allow the entire human race to be destroyed as “the creator” wanted. In
reality, if God had wanted to wipe out the entire race, He, as the omnipotent
one, most certainly could have done so. It is only because of His love, mercy,
and grace that he did not. Through the Lord’s mercies we are not consumed, Because His compassions fail not. They are new every morning; Great is
Your faithfulness. (Lamentations
3:22-23).
There was talk of “the creator” seeing
“goodness in all of us” in addition to the evil. This is typical of the view of
unbelieving man, which says, “I don’t know if there is a God, but if there is,
He will weigh my good against my bad, and if my good outweighs the bad, I will
be OK.” This all-too-common philosophy always reminds me of the Scripture that
says, There is a way that seems
right to a man, But its end is the way of death. (Proverbs 14:12, NKJV). The
philosophy presented in this and other allegedly “biblical” films is deadly to
the human soul. Salvation is by grace and grace alone, and no amount of doing
good can ever deal with the fact of sin.
In reality, we cannot expect
unbelievers to make a movie based on the Bible that even comes close to truth,
because the natural man does not receive the things of the
Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually
discerned (I Corinthians 2:14, NKJV).
Does this film have any redeeming value? Can it be a tool for Christians to use? I can say it has redeeming value if one is a fan of idiotic science fiction movies. Filmmakers can make any kind of movie they want, based on any book they want, and modified from the book as they see fit. I would say that if the book they are using is the Bible, they are doing a great disservice to God's Word when they change it to the point of making a perversion of the truth in order to fit their agenda. Believers should most certainly have the discernment to know truth from error. You are of God, little children, and have overcome them, because He who is in you is greater than he who is in the world. They are of the world. Therefore they speak as of the world, and the world hears them. We are of God. He who knows God hears us; he who is not of God does not hear us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error. (1 John 4:4-6).
The only positive thing I can see from "Noah" is that it very well could drive people who have never read about Noah to actually open their Bibles and read the true account for themselves. Opening up the Bible and being exposed to the actual Word of God is always a good thing, and it can be the first step to seeing the truth and coming to the Lord Jesus Christ by grace through faith. The entrance of Your words gives light; It gives understanding to the simple (Psalm 119:130, NKJV).
------------------------------
"Answers in Genesis" has addressed the issue of "Noah." The most recent article is found here.
