Our pastor
has been preaching through the book of Genesis on Sunday nights, and last night
he was in Genesis 7, which is the account of the flood. I appreciate very much
the fact that he believes and teaches the Scriptures as literal instead of
trying to discover something other than the clear and obvious meaning of a passage. This includes the book of Genesis.
Too many today
want to make the Scriptures mean something other than what they say. One truth
that is constantly attacked is the global flood of Noah. Why is this important?
Why is it a big deal if someone says the flood was local as opposed to global? It
is important because we need to believe what God has told us. If He has
deceived us about the extent of the judgment He brought by the flood, how can we
believe Him about anything else, such as the reality of sin, the necessity of
salvation, the virgin birth, the sacrifice of Christ, the resurrection, the
coming judgment, etc.?
There is no
doubt that the flood was God's judgment on the sin and evil of mankind at that
time. Many hate the very concept of God judging sin, but the truth of the
matter is that God judged the world once, and He will judge it again. This
truth is denied because man does not want to face the reality that God will
hold the human race accountable for sin.
If one reads
Genesis literally, it is really difficult to come up with anything but a global
flood. The only way to conclude that the flood was local is to come to the
Scriptures with a preconceived idea and interpret the events described
according to that bias. Even many Hebrew scholars who do not believe
that Genesis is true will admit that a literal reading of the text indicates actual
24-hour days for the creation week and a worldwide flood rather than a
local flood. Reading anything else into the text requires some interesting
mental gymnastics. It is in no way realistic and objective to read Genesis and
come to the conclusion, using the Scripture alone, that the days of creation
were millions of years and the flood was only local. Having one’s mind already influenced
by someone’s agenda is the only way this can happen.
One of the Major Assumptions of Progressive Creationism: The flood was “universal” (meaning
“local”) but not global.
The claim is that Noah built an ark that carried him, his
family, and the animals on an inland lake that was big enough to drown all of
the humans who lived at that time. This is what is meant by a “universal” flood
– it was just as widespread as humanity had migrated by that time, and there
was no necessity for it to be any larger, since its purpose was to wipe out the
human race other than Noah and his family.
There are several flaws in this thinking. I will address
those with a series of questions and brief answers.
If the flood was local, why did Noah need to build an
ark? Could he not have just moved elsewhere? God is neither stupid nor is He
inefficient. He knows what He is doing. There would have been no reason for God
to tell Noah to spend 120 years building an ark when he could have simply taken
his family to another area of the earth away from the flood.
Why
take animals on the ark when there would have been large numbers of most, if
not all, of the same species of animals outside the area of the flood? But God
had said He was going to destroy all flesh in which is the breath of life. Are
we to believe that not only all humans but also all animals lived in the area
where this supposed local flood took place?
“And all flesh died that moved on the
earth: birds and cattle and beasts and every creeping thing that creeps on the
earth, and every man. All in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit of
life, all that was on the dry land, died. So He destroyed all
living things which were on the face of the ground: both man and cattle,
creeping thing and bird of the air. They were destroyed from the earth. Only
Noah and those who were with
him in the ark remained alive.” (Genesis 7:21-23, NKJV).
How could a local flood cover the tops of all the mountains?
Even though it appears that the mountains were not as high before the flood as
they are now (Psalm 104), it would still be impossible for a local flood to
cover all of the mountains by 15 cubits (22½ feet, assuming an 18-inch cubit). “And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth, and all
the high hills under the whole heaven were covered. The waters prevailed
fifteen cubits upward, and the mountains were covered” (Genesis 7:19-20, NKJV).
Would not a local flood make God a liar when He said he
would never again flood the entire earth as He had done? There have been many
local floods since Noah’s time, and each and every one of them would underscore
God’s dishonesty if they were like Noah’s flood.
“Then the Lord
said in His heart, ‘I will never again curse the ground for man’s sake,
although the imagination of man’s heart is
evil from his youth; nor will I again destroy every living thing as I have
done. While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, winter and summer, and day
and night shall not cease’”
(Genesis
8:21-22, NKJV).
"And
God said: ‘This is the sign of
the covenant which I make between Me and you, and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations:
I
set My rainbow in the cloud, and it shall be for the sign of the covenant
between Me and the earth. It shall be, when I bring a cloud over the earth,
that the rainbow shall be seen in the cloud; and I will remember My covenant
which is between Me and you and
every living creature of all flesh; the waters shall never again become a flood
to destroy all flesh. The rainbow shall be in the cloud, and I will look on it
to remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of
all flesh that is on the
earth.’ And God said to Noah, ‘This is
the sign of the covenant which I have established between Me and all flesh that
is on the earth’” (Genesis
9:12-17, NKJV).
“For this is like the waters of Noah to Me; For as I have sworn that the
waters of Noah would no longer cover the earth, so have I sworn that I would
not be angry with you, nor rebuke you” (Isaiah 54:9, NKJV).
If Noah’s flood was only a local flood, every time we see a
rainbow, we should consider that to be a sign of God’s dishonesty. Clearly,
that is absurd. God gave that sign to humans and to the animals as a token of
His promise that He would never again destroy the world in the same way He
already did, and that promise is just as valid today as it was in the days of
Noah.
“God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He
should repent. Has He said, and will He not do? Or has He spoken, and will He
not make it good?” (Numbers
23:19, NKJV).
“…it is impossible for God to lie…” (Hebrews
6:18, NKJV).
“…in hope of eternal life which God, who
cannot lie, promised before time began…” (Titus 1:2, NKJV).
The
bottom line is that both evolutionists and progressive creationists need a
local flood, because a truly global flood explains the many fossil-containing
rock layers without any need for millions or billions of years. A global flood
would certainly change the topography of the earth. It is interesting to note
that some scientists who have observed Mars have concluded that the only
possible cause of its topography would be a global flood. Of course, the fact
that Mars has little or no water does not seem to be an issue for them. On the
other hand, when the topography of the earth is observed, there is immediate
rejection of a global flood and the question, “If there was a global flood,
where did all the water go?” Why do they ask this? The answer is obvious – a
global flood would make the Bible true, and we obviously can’t have that
because it would destroy evolution and progressive creationism. So “scientists”
who are willing to accept a global flood on a planet with little or no water
are not willing to accept the possibility of a global flood on a planet that is
covered 70% by water.
Christian Answers.net in an
article entitled "Where did the Flood Waters Go?"
offers the following:
“If the waters are still here, why are the highest mountains
not still covered with water, as they were in Noah’s day? Psalm 104 suggests an
answer. After the waters covered the mountains (verse 6), God rebuked them and
they fled (verse 7); the mountains rose, the valleys sank down (verse 8) and
God set a boundary so that they will never again cover the Earth (verse 9).
They are the same waters!”
“Isaiah gives this same statement that the waters of Noah
would never again cover the Earth (Isaiah 54:9). Clearly,
what the Bible is telling us is that God acted to alter the Earth's topography.
New continental landmasses bearing new mountain chains of folded rock strata
were uplifted from below the globe-encircling waters that had eroded and
leveled the pre-Flood topography, while large deep ocean basins were formed to
receive and accommodate the Flood waters that then drained off the emerging
continents.”
“That is why the oceans are so deep, and why there are
folded mountain ranges. Indeed, if the entire Earth's surface were leveled by
smoothing out the topography of not only the land surface but also the rock
surface on the ocean floor, the waters of the ocean would cover the Earth's
surface to a depth of 1.7 miles (2.7 kilometers). We need to remember that
nearly 70 percent of the Earth's surface is still covered by water. Quite
clearly, then, the waters of Noah's Flood are in today's ocean basins.”
